Following the misunderstanding and disagreements between courts regarding Article 593 of the IPC, general board of the supreme court, has issued a judgment called in 2/8/1396 according to which, if the injury incurred on the nose leads only to the fracture of the bone without damaging its other parts, and, if it can be cured and recovered without incurring any flaw and defects, it will cause one-tenth of full blood money. This judgment, due to not being a comprehensive judgment, could not solve the practical problems of the law courts. Furthermore, it can be criticized on two important grounds; 1. This judgment is not congruent with the text of the article 593 and negates this article in a way; 2. This judgment does not enjoy the support of any religious or even jurisprudential resources.
. (2021). A Critique on Uniform judicial precedent No. 761 Dated on 2/8/1396 of the General Board of the Supreme Court Concerning Blood Money for Nose Fracture. Ray (Judicial Case Review), 10(34), 59-73. doi: 10.22106/jcr.2021.530230.1340
MLA
. "A Critique on Uniform judicial precedent No. 761 Dated on 2/8/1396 of the General Board of the Supreme Court Concerning Blood Money for Nose Fracture", Ray (Judicial Case Review), 10, 34, 2021, 59-73. doi: 10.22106/jcr.2021.530230.1340
HARVARD
. (2021). 'A Critique on Uniform judicial precedent No. 761 Dated on 2/8/1396 of the General Board of the Supreme Court Concerning Blood Money for Nose Fracture', Ray (Judicial Case Review), 10(34), pp. 59-73. doi: 10.22106/jcr.2021.530230.1340
CHICAGO
, "A Critique on Uniform judicial precedent No. 761 Dated on 2/8/1396 of the General Board of the Supreme Court Concerning Blood Money for Nose Fracture," Ray (Judicial Case Review), 10 34 (2021): 59-73, doi: 10.22106/jcr.2021.530230.1340
VANCOUVER
. A Critique on Uniform judicial precedent No. 761 Dated on 2/8/1396 of the General Board of the Supreme Court Concerning Blood Money for Nose Fracture. Ray (Judicial Case Review). 2021;10(34):59-73 (In Persian). doi: 10.22106/jcr.2021.530230.1340
