The control of administrative actions and decisions may be carried out by the administrative body of the executive branch, the legislative branch or the judicial branch. While administrative and parliamentary control is very important, experience has proven that this type of monitoring is more useful for evaluating the degree of progress of goals and programs than responding to people's claims and complaints from the administrative system, which is recognized as an inalienable legal right for people. Is. Of course, in administrative reforms, the principles and methods of administrative and parliamentary supervision in a timely and impartial manner cannot be overlooked, but what is intended here is the control and supervision that should be carried out by the judiciary, i.e. the courts, so that the administrative officers may be able to Don't violate, violate and abuse their legal powers, and don't lose people's rights. The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran has established a supreme court called the Administrative Court of Justice to deal with administrative claims and complaints, which is responsible for supervising the regulations and administrative decisions and actions of the executive branch with laws and resolving disputes between individuals and the government. Article 173 of the constitutional amendment confirms this. What is examined in this article is the analysis of the decision number 43 of the General Board of the Administrative Justice Court that:

Does the supervision of the Court of Administrative Justice include non-governmental public institutions?

What is the view of the Constitution regarding this type of supervision by the Administrative Court of Justice?

What is the judicial procedure about this?